LANDSIGHT / RESEARCH BY INDUSTRY
A broker needs an owner list. A developer needs a site shortlist. A utility team needs a corridor register. We turn parcel records and sourced context into a research workflow built around the job.
Preview real records, source dates and coverage before choosing a county download.
Missing fields, partial overlays and unresolved matches stay attached to the research.
A shortlist, a review queue, a source packet or a brief your team can use.
BUILT FROM REAL RECORDS
These available examples show how we turn source data into something your team can act on. We confirm sources and coverage for each new location.
Boston’s FY2026 comparison matches 179,854 original FY2023 records by both property and map identifiers. A separate owner and mailing review queue contains 72,155 records with text changes.
Includes the complete dated Boston assessment CSV. Original maps remain unchanged; text differences are not confirmed transfers. A separate Nantucket comparison is also available.
Inspect the Boston comparison in the Suffolk pack →Soils supplements add drainage, seasonal water-table estimates and published soil limitations to 421,150 parcel records across five Ohio counties, with map-unit evidence and measured coverage.
Available in Allen, Butler, Delaware, Greene and Putnam. Survey estimates guide follow-up; they do not replace field testing or establish buildability.
Try the soils review workspace →The DC pack separates 73,545 condominium relationships from common-lot parcels. Its 25,509-record review queue exposes missing or multiple source links, with exact keys and every match retained.
A separate zoning review shows matched final-zone labels, special overlay areas, inclusionary designations and source links. A parent lot is not a unit boundary; zoning matches do not establish project permission.
Try the DC relationship and zoning workspaceFilter acreage and available flood, wetland and local zoning context. Export a shortlist with the original evidence, mapping coverage and source dates attached.
Use a real sample first, then open your purchased county CSV in the included tool.
Try the working shortlist →WHAT DOES YOUR TEAM NEED TO DO?
These packages define useful project scopes. Ready county files provide the starting data described below where fields are available. Additional research is quoted after location, source coverage, reuse rights and acceptance checks are confirmed.
Find properties matching a market and property type, with a usable route back to the recorded source.
Property shortlist + owner/mailing completeness report + source links + unresolved-record queue.
Recorded owner and available mailing/property fields, parcel geometry, source dates and coverage reports. Filter acreage and mapped context with the shortlist tool. DC also includes a separate condominium relationship review and a queue of missing or multiple links.
Repeated parcel IDs, stale owner dates and missing mailing fields can quietly weaken a list. A tax mailing address does not establish occupancy or willingness to sell.
Owner-name normalization, duplicate review, parcel groupings and source-verified property classifications. Sales/comparable evidence needs a separate source check.
County assessor and recorder records · Customer-authorized CRM or portfolio export
Compare candidate parcels before spending time on detailed site work.
Candidate matrix + mapped-constraint evidence + jurisdiction questions + prioritized follow-up list.
Parcel size, FEMA mapping and available local zoning/NWI overlays, with measured coverage and source dates. Five Ohio county packs also include NRCS soils, drainage, water-table estimates and dwelling/septic survey ratings. Check the county sample for included fields.
A parcel may span several zoning districts. Low mapped flood overlap does not establish usable acreage; wetlands, access, setbacks, utilities and terrain may still matter.
Source-verified zoning ordinances, soils, elevation/slope, road context and utility inquiry tracking. Engineering, boundary and entitlement decisions remain professional work.
Local planning/zoning authority · USDA NRCS soils · USGS elevation · Utility and road authorities
Assemble a location shortlist instead of comparing disconnected property records.
Site comparison table + ownership context + evidence gaps + custom map or dashboard scope.
County property classifications where populated, recorded owners, parcel boundaries and available mapped constraints. The DC pack adds final-zone and special-overlay review with source links.
Assessor use codes are not zoning permissions. A nearby road or utility line does not demonstrate capacity, connection rights or truck access.
Permitted-use research, published traffic counts, aggregate market context and customer-supplied access/capacity requirements. Licensed listings and comps are scoped separately.
Local planning and assessor records · State DOT traffic data · Census aggregate statistics · Customer-licensed listing/comparable sources
Narrow a search area while keeping ownership, land constraints and technical feasibility separate.
Candidate land matrix + land-control questions + mapped evidence + interconnection/utility follow-up register.
Parcel geometry, acreage, recorded owners and available flood, wetland and zoning context for a first-pass land screen. Five Ohio county packs add NRCS drainage, hydric-component and soil-slope estimates for follow-up research.
Distance to a line is not interconnection capacity. Mapped open acreage does not prove contiguous usable land, control of the site or an available connection.
Terrain and soils, published infrastructure context, local siting rules and project-specific exclusion layers after source and reuse checks.
DOE siting guidance · USGS elevation and USDA soils · Local siting authority · Utility/ISO published information and direct confirmation
Identify parcels and jurisdictions along a proposed route and coordinate the next research steps.
Route-to-parcel register + jurisdiction handoffs + missing-owner queue + source-linked review map.
County parcel geometry and recorded owner fields can seed a route intersection workflow. Ready downloads do not include a completed route study.
A parcel intersection is not an easement. Broadband availability is provider-reported; address-level source licensing and permitted reuse need separate review.
Customer corridor intersections, agency road/ROW layers, permit authority research and licensed service-location inputs where authorized.
Customer route geometry · County recorder and road authority · FCC public broadband map and applicable licensed sources
Know which records can be joined and which require human review before a map or report is used.
Join/conflict report + geometry and completeness review + field mapping + repeatable update specification.
CSV/GeoJSON, explicit record identifiers, source metadata and field-level coverage reports. Nantucket and the Boston portion of Suffolk include dated assessment comparisons with unresolved and unmatched records kept separate. DC includes exact condominium-to-assessment/common-lot/approval relationships, all candidate IDs and a review queue. QA records describe checks and limitations.
A valid geometry may still belong to the wrong place. Duplicate IDs, changed boundaries and conflicting source dates can survive a simple import check.
Schema normalization, identifier crosswalks, multi-vintage change comparisons and custom dashboards using agency-authorized inputs.
Agency authoritative parcel/assessment sources · FGDC cadastral framework · Customer prior-vintage data
Organize mapped environmental context and the locations that need closer investigation.
Mapped-feature intersection register + source-vintage report + field-review questions and evidence links.
Available NWI overlap, classifications, imagery years and project coverage, plus FEMA mapping and parcel ownership context.
No mapped wetland overlap is not evidence of wetland absence. Imagery age and project-footprint coverage affect what a screen can tell you.
Published environmental-record searches, conservation layers and customer-defined study buffers. Regulatory determinations and Phase I assessments require the appropriate professional process.
USFWS National Wetlands Inventory · FEMA flood mapping · EPA and state environmental records
Compare holdings or candidate land using consistent boundaries and relevant physical context.
Holding/parcel crosswalk + acreage comparison + mapped-constraint table + field-verification checklist.
Parcel acreage and ownership context with available flood/wetland mapping and dated source evidence. Five Ohio county packs add NRCS farmland classes, drainage and map-unit soil estimates, with measured survey coverage.
Recorded acres, mapped acres and usable acres can differ. Soil map units contain variability; survey interpretations are not site-specific field findings.
NRCS soils, USGS terrain, public land-cover data and customer management boundaries after coverage checks.
USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey · USGS elevation/land-cover sources · Customer management records
Match a portfolio to parcels and see which properties need additional evidence.
Match-confidence review + mapped-exposure table + unmapped/ambiguous queue + source-date summary.
Parcel geometry, source dates, match identifiers and available mapped flood/wetland context. These data support research, not eligibility or coverage decisions.
An address match can point to the wrong parcel. An unmapped location must not be treated as zero exposure, and map overlap is not a loss estimate.
Authorized portfolio matching, manual exception review and customer-defined aggregation. Modeling or policy-specific conclusions need a separately agreed methodology.
Customer-authorized portfolio · Authoritative county records · FEMA mapping and metadata
Bring parcel records, source links and unresolved questions together for professional review.
Parcel/source packet + record discrepancy list + missing-document checklist + GIS-ready exports.
Available assessor attributes, ownership context, parcel geometry, coverage reports and links to original records.
Tax parcel geometry is not a boundary survey. Recorded sale values, tax assessments and market value are different evidence types and may have different dates.
Recorder/assessor reconciliation, authorized comparison records and client-specific map exhibits. Boundary and value opinions remain professional work.
County assessor and recorder · Official plats and recorded instruments · Customer-authorized professional research
YOUR PROJECT, MADE CONCRETE
Select your work and a county. See the relevant data gaps, then download the evidence and next questions for your team.
This form stays in your browser. Downloading does not submit an inquiry.
Download an editable CSV with this sector’s questions and the selected county’s measured gaps. Assign reviewers, set dates and record evidence as you resolve each item. It starts as an open research worksheet.
TRY THE WORKFLOW
Open a free preview with real county sample records. Filter parcel acreage and available mapped context, inspect source fields and export the matches.
Our workflow suggestions combine available product fields with research needs described by these primary sources. They are project-scoping recommendations, not findings about an individual property.
County files report retrieved information, not a boundary survey, title opinion, appraisal, engineering design or regulatory approval. Use source dates, coverage and unresolved questions to plan the appropriate next review.
